Showing posts with label Aerodynamics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aerodynamics. Show all posts

Thursday, January 26, 2023

On yaw string behavior

 Yaw string is a basic "equipement" of our gliders, that often questions the people out of gliding movement. My answer to such inquiry is to say "this is a low cost sideslip sensor" - with a tongue in cheek...

Well yes yawstring relates to sideslip, but at the end do we really know how much the angle we observe  every flight relates to sideslip ?

Yaw string under control...

First let's define sideslip : it is as a convention the angle between the speed vector projected into wing plane & fuselage axis - a complicated way to describe that it quantify how much sideways the glider is flying. Sideslip is most of the time called "beta" - here is a sketch.

Sideslip definition

 

Now that sideslip is defined, how much yawstring angle relates to sideslip ? 

To answer this question,  Computationnal Fluid Dynamic results (CFD) provides a good view on fuselage local aerodynamic behavior.
Below is the flow picture obtained from CFD for a typical glider at beta=+4deg of sideslip (wind blowing on the right cheek of the pilot...). 


Friction line for a typical glider with 4deg of sideslip & 4deg of aoa

 Glider skin is colored according to local pressure, and friction lines are plotted, which are showing the flow direction right onto the skin. Those lines are illustrating how much locally the airflow is being "deformed" by fuselage presence, and in particular the way it is flowing laterally in symetry plane when sideslip is present. 

We can consider that the friction line at one location on the glider is giving the orientation of yaw string placed there - given a whool string is very thin compared to glider size & very close to fuselage skin. With appropriate post processing, the angle of friction lines versus glider symetry plane can be numerically evaluated from CFD output, and used for further analysis

CFD results in several condition  have been considered, to characterize yaw string response to glider parameters. Here is the plot of for yaw string angle computed for a typical canopy location, with Aoa ranging between 0 & 8 deg, and Sideslip between 0 & 8deg as well

Yaw string angle in relation to sideslip

The following observation can be made

  • Yaw string angle mostly respond to glider sideslip, and there is more yaw string angle than actual sisdeslip: yaw string is an amplifier for glider sideslip
  • In term of magnitude, typical "yaw string gain" is 2.5, that is when sideslip is 1deg, yaw string angle reads 2.5deg.
  • To a lesser extend, response of yaw string to sideslip evolves slightly with aoa - that is "yaw string gain" evolves slightly between cruise & circling phases

Another type of investigation can be made from CFD : when fixing the glider conditions, the gain of yaw string can be computed for various position over the glider. The following curve can be plotted, that gives the yawstring gain versus its relative positionning versus nose, in proportion to maximum height.
(e.g : Nose distance/max fuse height=0.85 on a 80cm high fuselage means yawstring is placed 0.85*90=76.5cm away from the nose)

Yaw string gain in relation to yaw string positionning vs fuselage nose

From this curve, it can be observed that the more forward on fuselage is (Nose distance/max fuse height toward 0), the greater the yaw string gain is, that is the more the yaw string amplifies the sideslip. This may help you tune the position of your yaw string, depending how much you want it to be active.

A small statistical study for yaw string positioning over 8 modern single seaters of various class, and 3 double seaters has been performed, with following findings :

  • On single seater or in forward seat of double seater, yaw string generaly lies between 0.85 & 1.05 times the max fuselage height from nose, meaning yaw string gain is in the range of 2.4 to 2.6
  • For the instructor seat of double seater, yawstring lies much further back, close to 2 times the max height from the nose : in that region yaw string gain is expected to be much closer to 1. That is instructor reads less sideslip from yaw string than his pupil does !

For sure there are exception to this rule when glider fuselage shape is out of the ordynary - typically yawstring gain on a Libelle would likely show a somewhat different behavior.

May be you will now look differently to your yaw string when you are flying !



Monday, October 22, 2012

Flying with tufts

On a blue thermal day, I spent some time adding whool tufts at wing/fuselage junction of my LS6. Here is the result :


The objective was to visualize flow separation in the root of LS6 glider.

Result : flow in wing fuselage junction is sensitive to aoa & aileron:flap deflection.
It can be observed in stall :
Separation occurs at lower fuselage attitude when flap increase. Tip : visualize this by looking at tail position vs horizon when separation appears.
It can be observed in normal flight :
In straight flight, separation is not visible. Very slight tuft activity on the fuselage sides.
While circling, separation occurs quite often, particularly on the wing inside turn. This is likely driven by the additionnal aerodynamic load brought by aileron offset ut of the turn to keep bank angle.

Next time :
Tufts should be applied on both sides It could be interesting to pull some G's to see what happens

Monday, January 30, 2012

Back in 2008, I had the opportunity to organize a cession at ISAE wind tunnel, in frame of a student project. It was concern with the characterisation of a sailplane model, the Jibe 2 from Flybiwo.

If found I had stored some image from this cessions, here they are assembled in a short video.


Pure geek material ;-)

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

LS6 winglet project

It has now been a long thought project : adding up my own winglets to LS6a "AD".



The story of the design and corresponding detailed aerodynamic analysis has been presented during XXXth OSTIV congress in Szeged (August 2010).
Summary :
  • This winglet design has converged, using reasonnably simple method and pragmatic considerations
  • A CAD model, compatible with milling constraints, has been created by Flybiwo
  • A set of Navier stockes computation has been performed using TAU code (DLR)
It is now a matter of actually building and flying those winglet :-)

For different reasons (including funding...) the materialisation of those winglet is stalled for now. If you show an interest to it, don't hesitate to contact me !
matthieu.scherrer 'at' free.fr

Friday, August 29, 2008

New technical paper

I have issued a new technical paper on my (old) web site. It is concerned with some method to implement automated wing optimization scheme with constraint span.

The paper is available on my publication page.

Friday, April 25, 2008

Results from the Wind Tunnel

Some time has been already spent analysing wind tunnel results, they can now be presented, at least partly.

Here are screen shot of drag polars, as obtained during the test.






Note that the test were repeated over the different days : it can be seen that reproductibility of the result is not garanted at low speed (V=20m/s).

The Excel file containing the summary of results versus predictions can be found here.

Thanks again to the participants for accepting their prediction to be compared to measurements from the windtunnel !

Friday, March 21, 2008

End of the wind tunnel cession

Today was the last time of wind tunnel testing.

Some bugs in the coefficient have been detected, some post processing will be necessary before releasing official data. So that comparison will not be possible before some days.

Please be patient !


Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Some news from the Wind Tunnel

Here are some photos from the wind tunnel.

As the operating & recording system of S4 wind tunnel has jsut been updated, it is likely the release of the results will be delayed. Proper check of all the results will be necessary first.



Monday, March 17, 2008

Aerodynamic prediction worshop - End of prediction period

The Jibe 2 is entering the windtunnel this week. Today was riging period, tomorrow will be the first test with wind on.

Now the period for prediction has ended ! Here is a summary of the result i got, from 6 differnt people / team.


Next part will be the comparison with the outcome of the test !

Here are some details about the methods used for those predictions.


Method
MSch Wing & tail + interaction : Miarex (Xfoil/lifting-line coupling, N=9 for wing, N=2 for tail)
Fuselage : Xfoil + Mangler transformation
Lateral : AVL + drag effect in aero axis (Miarex)
TPla Xfoil plus 3D transpositions
Simplified Cdi assumption
Fuselage effect on Cm from in-house rule (from flight test & statistical approach)
ADe XFLR5-V4

Jo&Stef VSAERO : Linearized potential code, coupled with BL calculation
PLu AVL for stability & induced drag
Xfoil for airfoil drag with N<5>
FMe XFLR5-V3

Saturday, February 23, 2008

Model aerodynamic prediction workshop - Update

Some update concerning Jibe 2 wind tunnel test project.

The preparation of the wind tunnel test by the two students in charge, Thomas & Sylvain, is still ongoing.

The wind tunnel cession will take place at S4 facility between the 10th & 14th of march 2008.

The airframe to be tested was just received from Flybiwo.

It must be prepared for receiving the inner measurement balance. Aileron & elevator will be installed, and their efficiency evaluated.

Monday, January 7, 2008

Model aerodynamic prediction workshop

I have the opportunity to organize a wind tunnel test cession on a F5B model airframe from François Lorrain.
A student team from ISAE has choosen the Jibe 2 model for an aerodynamic evaluation within S4 wind tunnel.


I find interesting and profitable to build up some emulation around this project among those who practice/masterize aerodynamic calculations.

There is here a nice opportunity to have an experimental feedback, and not only compute in "open loop".

Ipropose to organize a "Model aerodynamic prediction workshop" : the objective is for you to forecast what the outcome of the wind tunnel test will be, using whatever means ranging from rule of thumb to NS or LES computation .

The test should take place in March 08 (week tbd), with the complete airframe but the propeller off. Investigations will be performed with a 6axis balance installed, measuring both in longitudinal & lateral, for having a complete views of aerodynamic coefficients (performance & stability derivatives).


If you happen to be interested in joining this, I have prepared a file containing a priori all the information needed about Jibe2 geometry, with the kind agreement of Francois Lorrain.

Your results should be sent to me before beginning of march to be published.
matthieu.scherrer 'at' free.fr

Then we will carry on with the wind tunnel test, and see the outcomes !
I will try to ensure a proper following through on by blog.

Well, here is the idea, let's make it interesting ! Any input will be anyway profitable to the community !

Saturday, December 1, 2007

Preparation of technical study of LS6 glider

I am collecting as much technical information as possible about my glider type.
if you have any information, please don't hesitate to contact me
matthieu.scherrer'at'free.fr

The objective is for me to test available tools for aerodynamic computaton and prediction on a precise book case. I base my study on on LS6 measured planform and wing airfoils.

The geometry of LS6 wing have been translated for MIAReX, my tool coupling lifting line theory and Xfoil results.
The final objective is to test how accurate such a tool could be at predicting the speed polar, and have a first hestimate of non linear behavior of the wing for handling quality evaluation.

I have also been preparing the formated file for having the complete saiplane geometry of LS6 available in AVL.
The objective is to be able to study the rigid, linear handling quality of the LS6 glider over its flight domain.


Using those tools, I hope to progress in the understanding and prediction of the aerodynamic of sailplanes, and mine in the first place !